Paleontology How reliable is radiocarbon dating? - Quora Their recent analysis of sediment from the largest freshwater lake in northeast China showed that its carbon clock stopped ticking as early as 30,000 years ago, or nearly half as long as was hitherto thought. This guy seriously questions the veracity of radiocarbon dating, and the fossil. Carbon dating has a well-known list of foibles including the following
Reasons To Believe Can We Verify Carbon Dating's Reliability? For instance, remnants of organic matter formerly held up as solid evidence of the most recent, large-scale global warming event some 40,000 years ago may actually date back far earlier to a previous ice age. Libby's research demonstrated the usefulness of carbon-14 in dating samples thousands of years old. Though radiocarbon dating clearly.
Many global warming studies may be wrong as carbon dating found. As scientists who study earth’s (relatively) modern history rely on this measurement tool to place their findings in the correct time period, the discovery that it is unreliable could put some in a quandary. Radiocarbon dating, which is used to calculate the age of certain organic materials, has been found to be unreliable, and sometimes wildly so.